Shutdown of thermohaline circulation
There is some speculation that global warming could, via a shutdown or
slowdown of the thermohaline circulation, trigger localised cooling in the
North Atlantic and lead to cooling, or lesser warming, in that region. This
would particularly affect areas such as Ireland,
Britain
and Nordic countries that are warmed by the North Atlantic drift. The chances of this
occurring are unclear; there is some evidence for the stability of the Gulf Stream
but a possible weakening of the North Atlantic drift; and there is evidence of
warming in northern Europe and nearby seas, rather than the reverse. In coupled
Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models
the THC tends to weaken somewhat rather than stop, and the warming effects
outweigh the cooling, even over Europe.
Thermohaline circulation and fresh
water
Heat is transported from the equator polewards
mostly by the atmosphere but also by ocean
currents, with warm water near the surface and cold water at deeper
levels. The best known segment of this circulation is the Gulf Stream, a
wind-driven gyre,
which transports warm water from the Caribbean
northwards. A northwards branch of the Gulf Stream, the North Atlantic Drift,
is part of the thermohaline circulation (THC),
transporting warmth further north to the North Atlantic, where its effect in
warming the atmosphere contributes to warming Europe. Other factors are also
important, such as atmospheric waves that bring subtropical air
further north, which have been suggested to influence the Climate of the British Isles more than the
Gulf Stream. The evaporation
of ocean water in the North Atlantic increases the salinity
of the water as well as cooling it, both actions increasing the density of
water at the surface. The formation of sea ice
further increases the salinity. This dense water then sinks and the circulation
stream continues in a southerly direction. Global warming could lead to an
increase in freshwater
in the northern oceans, by melting glaciers
in Greenland
and by increasing precipitation, especially through Siberian
rivers.
It is by no means clear that
sufficient freshwater could be provided to interrupt thermohaline circulation;
the Younger Dryas
are a period where this might have been the case, although there is some disagreement
as to its cause.
The red end of the spectrum indicates slowing in this presentation of the
trend of velocities derived from NASA Pathfinder altimeter data from May 1992
to June 2002. Source: NASA.
Some even fear that global warming may be able to trigger the type of
abrupt massive temperature shifts which occurred during the last glacial period: a series of Dansgaard-Oeschger events – rapid climate
fluctuations – may be attributed to freshwater forcing at high latitude
interrupting the THC. The Younger Dryas event may have been of this sort,
too. (See the discussion of chaos theory for related ideas.) However, these
events are believed to have been triggered by massive freshwater discharges
from the Laurentide
ice sheet, rather than from the melting of polar sea-ice and precipitation
changes associated with the increased open water in global warming. Meltwater
events aside, the climate deterioration into the last ice age appears to have
taken about 5,000 years. Also, in coupled Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models
the THC tends to weaken somewhat rather than stop, and the warming effects
outweigh the cooling, even locally: the IPCC Third Assessment Report
notes that "even in models where the THC weakens, there is still a warming
over Europe". Model runs
in which the THC is forced to shut down do show cooling – locally up to
8 °C (14 °F)
— although the largest anomalies occur over the North Atlantic, not over
land. However, climate models are not sufficiently sophisticated at present to
include climatic factors which give these predictions veracity; e.g., the
recent return of deep convection to the subpolar gyre in both the Labrador and
Irminger seas and the growing ice mass of Greenland.
Studies of the Florida Current suggest that the Gulf Stream
weakens with cooling, being weakest (by ~10%) during the Little Ice
Age.
Measurements in 2004, 2005, 2008 and
2010
In April 2004, the hypothesis that the Gulf Stream is switching off received a
boost when a retrospective analysis of U.S. satellite data seemed to show a
slowing of the North Atlantic Gyre, the northern swirl of the
Gulf Stream.
In May 2005, Peter Wadhams reported to The Times of
London about the results of investigations in a submarine under
the Arctic ice sheet measuring the giant chimneys of cold dense water, in which
the cold dense water normally sinks down to the sea bed
and is replaced by warm water, forming one of the engines of the North Atlantic
Drift. He and his team found the chimneys to have virtually disappeared.
Normally there are seven to twelve giant columns, but Wadhams found only two
giant columns, both extremely weak.
In 2008, Vage et al. reported "the return of deep convection to the
subpolar gyre in both the Labrador and Irminger seas in the winter of
2007–2008," employing "profiling float data from the Argo program to
document deep mixing," and "a variety of in situ, satellite and
reanalysis data" to set the context for the phenomenon. This might have a
lot to do with the observations of variations in cold water chimney behaviour.
In January 2010, the Gulf Stream briefly connected with the West Greenland Current after fluctuating
for a few weeks due to an extreme negative phase of the Arctic oscillation, temporarily diverting it
west of Greenland.
Bryden measurements reported late 2005
The NewScientist.com news service
reported on 30 November 2005 that
the National Oceanography Centre
in the UK found a 30% reduction in the warm currents
that carry water north from the Gulf Stream from the last such measurement in
1992. The authors note that currently the observed changes are
"uncomfortably close" to the uncertainties in the measurements.
However, the North Atlantic is currently warmer than in the earlier
measurements. This suggests that either the circulation is not weakening, or
that, even if it is weakening, the weakening is not having the hypothesised
cooling effect, or that other factors are able to overwhelm any cooling.
The New Scientist article was based on an article in Nature.
In News and Views in the
same issue, Detlef Quadfasel reinforces the point that the uncertainty of the
estimates of Bryden et al. is high, but says other factors and
observations do support their results. Quadfasel continues by pointing out the
significance of the possible implications, with palaeoclimate
records showing drops of air temperature up to 10 °C within decades, linked to
abrupt switches of ocean circulation when a certain threshold is reached. He
concludes that further observations and modelling are crucial for providing
early warning of a possible devastating breakdown of the circulation.
On 19 January 2006, a News Feature Climate change: A sea change by
Quirin Schiermeier appeared in Nature, detailing reactions to the Bryden
results. Points made by Schiermeier include the following:
- The results are a surprise to scientists in the field.
- Modelling suggests that increase of fresh water flows large enough to shut down the thermohaline circulation would be an order of magnitude greater than currently estimated to be occurring, and such increases are unlikely to become critical within the next hundred years; this is hard to reconcile with the Bryden measurements.
- The Bryden results could be caused by natural variation, or "noise", that is, coincidence.
- If the results are correct, perhaps thermohaline circulation reductions will not have the drastic effects that have been predicted on European cooling.
- While previous shutdowns (e.g. the Younger Dryas) are thought by some scientists to have caused cooling, the current overall climate is believed to be different; in particular, sea-ice formation is hypothesized to be less because of overall global warming.
- However, a thermohaline circulation shutdown could have other major consequences apart from cooling of Europe, such as an increase in major floods and storms, a collapse of plankton stocks, warming or rainfall changes in the tropics or Alaska and Antarctica (including those from intensified El Niño effect), more frequent and intense El Niño events, or an oceanic anoxic event (oxygen (O2) below surface levels of the stagnant oceans becomes completely depleted — a probable cause of past mass extinction events).
No comments:
Post a Comment